Sexism in the Presidential Campaign

McCain's announcement of Sarah Palin - governor of Alaska - as his running mate today has me reflecting on the accusations of sexism in the coverage of this year's race. I've been skeptical of the claims of Hilary backers because she's such a unique figure. If a cable news host calls her "power hungry," is it because she's a woman, because she's is perceived to be where she is because of nepotism, because she lacks Obama's charisma, or for some other reason? It's impossible to say because not only because a woman has never been a realistic presidential candidate, but also because she's such a charged figure from the Clinton Years.

That being said, the "Commander In Chief" vetting that Palin is now undergoing doesn't pass the sniff test. Palin's resume is thin, but not barren. She's been in politics 16 years as a City Councilwoman, mayor, in various state government executive positions, and for two years as a successful governor. Contrast this to Obama's resume: 11 years in politics as a state senator and senator, as well as stint's as a community organizer and law lecturer. Neither of these resume's is clearly better than the other.

Obama is widely seen, however, as (possibly arguably) ready to be President. Yes, readiness is the central message repubs are pushing, but he is leading in the polls. I get the feeling that most people see him as a legitimate President, even if they plan on voting against him. Palin is a different story, though. My gut reaction on hearing her announcement, and what I'm guessing most people feel, is that she's clearly unready to assume the mantle. Part of this, of course, is because of the fact that most of us have never seen her before and because she's a Washington outsider. I do think the fact that she's a young, good looking woman plays a significant role, however. And make no mistake, Sarah Palin is a babe: